UtilitySansar
Texto

Readability Score Checker

Score any text against the five most-cited readability formulas — Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade, Gunning Fog, SMOG, the Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Coleman-Liau — so you can match your writing to the audience you actually want to reach. See the averaged grade level, the school-level audience label, and word/sentence/syllable stats at a glance.

Resumen de la herramienta

Esta herramienta acepta entrada estructurada y devuelve una salida determinista en el navegador, sin enviar nada al servidor.

Nombre de la herramienta
Readability Score Checker
Intención de entrada
Proporciona contenido fuente para transformar, validar o analizar.
Intención de salida
Recibe una salida normalizada lista para copiar, reutilizar o depurar.
Entrada de ejemplo
Plain language is a style of writing that values clarity over cleverness. When you write for general readers, short sentences and familiar words help your message land.
Salida de ejemplo
Flesch ease: 67.0 (8th-9th grade — plain English) · Average grade: 8.2
Recent inputs0

Your last 5 inputs will appear here.

Flesch Reading Ease
70.17th grade — fairly easy
Average grade level
8.2
HarderEasier
Flesch-Kincaid
5.7grade

U.S. school grade required to read the text on first pass.

Gunning Fog
8.0grade

Years of formal education needed; weights complex (3+ syllable) words.

SMOG
8.8grade

Estimated years of education for full comprehension. Best on 30+ sentence samples.

Automated Readability
7.2grade

ARI uses characters and sentences instead of syllables — useful for short text.

Coleman-Liau
11.0grade

Like ARI, character-based. Good for OCR'd or auto-generated text.

Average of five
8.2grade

Average of all five grade-level formulas. A balanced single number.

Sentences8
Words73
Syllables110
Complex words8
Letters373

Introducción a la herramienta

Score any text against the five most-cited readability formulas — Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade, Gunning Fog, SMOG, the Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Coleman-Liau — so you can match your writing to the audience you actually want to reach. See the averaged grade level, the school-level audience label, and word/sentence/syllable stats at a glance.

Visión general de la herramienta

Different formulas weight different things — Flesch-Kincaid leans on syllable counts, ARI and Coleman-Liau use character counts, Gunning Fog and SMOG penalize long words. Each gives a slightly different angle on the same draft. Showing all five plus their average makes it easy to spot when your writing is genuinely too dense versus when one formula is over-penalizing a niche style. Everything runs client-side; no draft is uploaded.

Casos de uso

  • Tune marketing copy to a 6th-9th grade reading level for broad reach
  • Audit technical documentation for accidental jargon density
  • Match academic writing to journal or course expectations
  • Test ESL-friendly content against the Flesch ease score
  • Compare different drafts of the same paragraph side-by-side

Ejemplos de entrada/salida

Short sentences and familiar words land in the 'plain English' band — exactly what most marketing and journalism target.
Intención de entrada
Plain language is a style of writing that values clarity over cleverness. When you write for general readers, short sentences and familiar words help your message land.
Intención de salida
Flesch ease: 67.0 (8th-9th grade — plain English) · Average grade: 8.2

Preguntas frecuentes

Which score should I trust?+
Look at the average. For most general writing the Flesch Reading Ease is the most intuitive — aim for 60-70 to reach the broad public. For technical writing, the average grade level is the more useful number.
Why do the scores disagree?+
Each formula weights different signals. SMOG penalizes 3+ syllable words heavily, ARI focuses on character counts. A draft full of short technical jargon (like 'SQL', 'API') confuses character-based formulas but Flesch-Kincaid handles it fine.
Is the syllable count exact?+
It's heuristic — like every browser-based readability tool — and accurate within a few percent for English text. Names, acronyms, and very unusual spellings can drift.
Does it work for non-English?+
The formulas were calibrated for English. Spanish, French, German, etc. will still produce numbers, but the grade-level mapping isn't valid. Use it for relative comparisons, not absolute claims.

Explorar más herramientas

Descubre utilidades relacionadas en la categoría Texto a continuación.

Ver todo de Texto

Herramientas relacionadas

Utilidades seleccionadas que podrían serte útiles